What does AFSPA mean in LEGISLATION
The Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) is a controversial law found in many countries throughout the world, primarily in India and Pakistan. AFSPA is an act that grants certain powers to the armed forces operating within certain regions of the country, allowing them to use their own discretion when dealing with situations that may require extra action beyond the scope of civil law.
AFSPA meaning in Legislation in Governmental
AFSPA mostly used in an acronym Legislation in Category Governmental that means Armed Forces Special Powers Act
Shorthand: AFSPA,
Full Form: Armed Forces Special Powers Act
For more information of "Armed Forces Special Powers Act", see the section below.
Essential Questions and Answers on Armed Forces Special Powers Act in "GOVERNMENTAL»LEGISLATION"
What are the powers granted by AFSPA?
Under AFSPA, various special powers are granted to the armed forces, such as the authority to search any area or person within its jurisdiction without a warrant, and also grants immunity from prosecution except with permission from Central Government of India.
Where is AFSPA enforced?
AFSPA is currently enforced in areas considered to be ‘disturbed' by either state governments or central government. These include states such as Jammu & Kashmir, Assam and Manipur.
Are there any restrictions on what power the armed forces have under AFSPA?
Yes, while they can exercise certain level of discretion while acting under AFPSA, it does not grant unlimited powers and still adheres to international human rights laws.
Is AFSPA applicable for non-combat situations?
Yes, non-combat operations may also be conducted under AFPSA if dangerous conditions arise or circumstances give reason for suspicion or danger.
Can civilians sue under AFPSA?
Although complaints can be filed against members of the armed forces for actions taken under this act, lawsuits cannot be filed due to their immunity from prosecution.
Final Words:
As a result of this act's power given to armed forces personnel and its broad scope in determining what constitute a 'disturbed area', it has been heavily criticized by both national and international organizations alike. Nevertheless, it remains an important tool for authorities looking to maintain order where no civil law prevails.